Skip to content
Talk to the Team

Resources for Providers

The shockwave & EMTT knowledge library.

Expert-led content to help you get more out of shockwave in practice: webinars, clinical research, real case studies, and field notes from 35+ years inside the technology, all in one place.

35+

Years in shockwave

1,000+

Providers supported

1st

U.S. Storz Medical distributor

Resources for Providers

Making clinics better, together

From webinars and research to case studies — the knowledge providers rely on to stay ahead.

Research

The evidence base

Studies and reviews behind focused, radial, and EMTT technology.

Blog

35 years of perspective

Case Studies

Real clinics, real outcomes

How providers build successful, profitable shockwave programs.

Let's connect

Let's talk like people.

A quick chat, a short form, or a demo with Gerhard. However you like to start.

Webinars

Learn from the peers that are succeeding with shockwave & EMTT

Expert-led sessions on clinical application, protocols, patient communication, and practice growth — recorded and on demand.

10 sessions

Case Studies

Real clinics. Real numbers.

Providers on how shockwave changed the care they deliver, and the businesses they run. Every story comes straight from their own words.

Your story here

Running a successful shockwave program? We're always adding new provider case studies.

Reach out to share

Research

The evidence, minus the rabbit hole

A curated shortlist from the shockwave & EMTT literature — what each study found, and where to read it in full.

Spine 2026

Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Combined With Conventional Physical Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This systematic review and network meta-analysis examined 14 randomized controlled trials involving 738 patientsand compared ESWT, conventional physical therapy, sham treatment, and the combination of shockwave with physical therapy. ESWT significantly reduced pain compared with sham treatment, while the combination of ESWT plus conventional physical therapy produced greater pain reduction and functional improvement than physical therapy alone. These findings support a practical approach to shockwave integration: it does not have to replace the way clinicians already assess, treat, and rehabilitate patients. Instead, shockwave can become another tool within an existing treatment plan, working alongside rehabilitation to potentially improve outcomes.

Pubmed 42359248 Read
Mechanism 2026

Use of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for the Management of Bone Pathologies: A Systematic Review

This systematic review evaluated 53 studies involving 1,835 adult patients across bone conditions including delayed and nonunion fractures, osteonecrosis, bone stress injury, medial tibial stress syndrome, and bone marrow edema. Seven studies provided Level I evidence, with findings showing ESWT could achieve outcomes comparable to established interventions in select bone pathologies, including long-bone nonunion and early-stage femoral head osteonecrosis. Across studies reporting safety, no significant adverse events were identified. The review highlights the growing role of shockwave beyond traditional tendon applications, particularly focused shockwave, as clinicians explore noninvasive strategies for influencing bone healing and managing challenging orthopedic conditions.

Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine | Systematic Review Read
Tendinopathy 2026

The Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This large systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated 65 publications representing 3,921 patients across common tendinopathies, including lateral epicondylitis, Achilles tendinopathy, rotator cuff tendinopathy, greater trochanteric pain syndrome, and patellar tendinopathy. ESWT demonstrated significant pain improvements over placebo for several major conditions, with particularly favorable evidence for lateral epicondylitis, Achilles tendinopathy, and rotator cuff tendinopathy. The results reinforce an important clinical point: shockwave is not simply a treatment for “tendon pain.” Its value is greatest when the technology and treatment strategy are matched appropriately to the pathology, supporting a more targeted, evidence-driven approach to MSK care.

Orthopaedic Surgery | Systematic Review & Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Read

Kinas Medical shares research to inform clinical judgment — not to promise outcomes. Results depend on patient selection, dosing, and integration into a full plan of care.

The Blog

Where Shockwave Knowledge Meets Practice

Practical perspective on the clinical, business, and research questions providers actually ask.

View All Posts

FAQ

Straight answers to the questions we hear most

Got a different question?

Ask Kinas answers from 35+ years of shockwave expertise — with linked sources, and a real person one click away whenever you want one.

Ask Otto

Answers from 35+ years of expertise
Hi, I’m Otto, your Kinas Medical assistant! I’m here to help with questions about shockwave, EMTT, and how Kinas can support your practice.

Radial pressure waves disperse from the surface across a broader field, while focused shockwaves converge at a selected depth and focal zone. The better choice depends on tissue type, depth, diagnosis, and treatment goal — one isn’t automatically better than the other. Many practices run both, and our team can help you match the energy-delivery model to what you treat.

EMTT (Extracorporeal Magnetotransduction Therapy) uses high-energy electromagnetic pulses rather than acoustic shockwaves. It’s often integrated as a comfortable, non-contact complement in musculoskeletal, pain, function, and recovery plans — it isn’t another form of shockwave, and it isn’t interchangeable with traditional PEMF.

Yes. A clinician might use radial for broad soft-tissue preparation, focused for a precise deeper target, and EMTT as a comfortable complementary modality. The sequence and parameters should be set by trained clinical judgment for the case in front of you — not a universal package.

Commonly plantar fasciopathy, Achilles and patellar tendinopathy, lateral epicondylitis, shoulder and calcific tendinopathies, greater trochanteric pain, proximal hamstring tendinopathy, myofascial pain, and select bone stress injuries. Focused systems add depth and precision for deeper or calcific targets.

For most practices, yes — shockwave is typically delivered as a cash-based service with strong patient demand, which is part of why providers track a clear return on their investment. We can share business-planning resources, but outcomes and revenue always depend on patient selection, pricing, and consistent use.

Yes. New users get help selecting a platform, building staff confidence, setting up workflows, and introducing the service to patients. Ongoing education runs through Kinas Medical and its training partners — including the Academy of Shockwave Excellence, webinars, and direct access to instructors.

As the first U.S.-authorized Storz Medical distributor, we provide access to Storz Medical technology along with U.S.-based product guidance, onboarding, training, service, accessories, and implementation resources. When another company offers the same Storz platform, the real comparison is the support relationship and total ownership experience.

That phrase is common but oversimplified. Shockwave doesn’t smash or dissolve tissue — the mechanical stimulus influences tissue signaling, circulation, and remodeling, which can support scar reduction over time. We keep patient-facing language evidence-informed rather than promising a specific result.